首页 社会内容详情
区块链澳洲幸运5官网(www.eth0808.vip):Citigroup’s Revlon blunder ends with dismissal after bank’s victory

区块链澳洲幸运5官网(www.eth0808.vip):Citigroup’s Revlon blunder ends with dismissal after bank’s victory

分类:社会

标签: # 皇冠体育开户

网址:

SEO查询: 爱站网 站长工具

点击直达

皇冠开户平台www.hg9988.vip)是皇冠官方开户平台,开放皇冠信用网代理申请、信用网会员开户,线上投注的官方平台。

The order of dismissal came on Monday after the last holdouts among the lenders agreed to return their share of US$504mil (RM2.24bil) the creditors still had following Citigroup’s victory in court.

NEW YORK: A hard-fought battle between Citigroup Inc and creditors of Revlon Inc over an epic blunder in which the bank accidentally sent the lenders almost a billion dollars was finally capped with a legal pronouncement: Case dismissed.

The order of dismissal came Monday after the last holdouts among the lenders agreed to return their share of US$504mil (RM2.24bil) the creditors still had following Citigroup’s victory in court.

That sum was part of an original errant payment of more than US$900mil (RM4bil), some of which had already been voluntarily returned to the bank by other recipients.

“Any pending motions are moot,” US district judge Jesse Furman in Manhattan wrote in the order of dismissal. “All conferences are cancelled. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.”

It’s an ordinary document closing an extraordinary case, in which the bank sued the creditors – including Brigade Capital Management, HPS Investment Partners and Symphony Asset Management – for the return of the funds.

Citigroup had mistakenly transferred them in August 2020 while trying to make an interest payment as an administrative agent on a loan, a blunder that became the talk of Wall Street.

,

区块链澳洲幸运5官网www.eth0808.vip)区块链澳洲幸运5官网(www.eth0808.vip)是用以太坊区块高度哈希值开奖的区块链澳洲幸运5官网,区块链澳洲幸运5官网有别于传统澳洲幸运5游戏,区块链澳洲幸运5官网绝对公平,区块链澳洲幸运5官网结果绝对无法作假。

,

In February 2021 the lenders won a surprise trial court decision saying they didn’t have to return the money. The judge said the creditors shouldn’t have been expected to know that the transfer was an error.

Then, three months ago, a federal appeals court overturned the trial court’s decision.

It was a major victory for Citigroup’s main banking unit in its efforts to redeem the embarrassing lapse, which forced the bank to explain to regulators how such a failure was possible.

Citigroup declined to comment on the case’s conclusion Monday. Lawyers from Quinn Emanuel representing the lenders, and representatives for Brigade, Symphony, and HPS also declined to comment.

Even after Citigroup’s victory at the appeals court, the funds still had to be returned.

On Dec 5, the bank and the lenders told Furman that three of the defendants were prepared to sign an agreement ending the litigation, while there had been “substantial progress” in talks with the others. — Bloomberg


转载说明:本文转载自Sunbet。,

chơi tài xỉu bóng đá(www.84vng.com):chơi tài xỉu bóng đá(www.84vng.com) cổng Chơi tài xỉu uy tín nhất việt nam。chơi tài xỉu bóng đá(www.84vng.com)game tài Xỉu đánh bạc online công bằng nhất,chơi tài xỉu bóng đá(www.84vng.com)cổng game không thể dự đoán can thiệp,mở thưởng bằng blockchain ,đảm bảo kết quả công bằng.

 当前暂无评论,快来抢沙发吧~

发布评论